How to read the sky
Work in progress. Not everything is collected, checked or verified yet. What is checked glows; what is not, does not. Missing is not the same as clean.
Connected is not guilty.
Each line is a lawful filing. The page draws no conclusions. Every line links to its filing.
Sky. The ring. Drag to turn. Wheel to zoom. Click a galaxy's name to fly to it. Click a star: only what it touches stays.
Flows. Ten groups on a circle. A band is money or a person moving from one group to another, from filed records: contributions, lobbying, contracts, grants, board seats, the revolving door. Thicker is more. Hover: one line. Click: the records.
Loops. A company lobbied a bill. A member introduced it. The company's PAC paid that member. Three filings on one page: companies left, bills middle, members right. The gold arc is the gift, as wide as it was. Click a loop: the three records.
Funding, two ways only. Anonymous: never named here. Open: named, with a report on the giver next to every mention. Funding buys nothing else. Today: no funders, no business ties to anyone on the map, no known conflict. If you are named and want to answer: send it, we post it.
PRIGH · the public sky · for the people, not against anyone.
How the map is made
One standard, applied the same way to every entity and every connection, including the ones we would rather not find. These are the rules that keep the map honest as it grows.
Verified is not the same as culpable.
Every glow and every line describes how far the checking has gone, never whether anyone did anything wrong. A board seat, a contract, a contribution, a confirmation to office: each is a lawful, filed fact.
Reports describe records, not motives: "not disclosed in the filings examined", never "hidden"; "the filing states", never "wants the public to believe". The test for any line: could the organization read it and agree it describes the record accurately, even if it dislikes the conclusion?
Drafted by programs, with AI assistance, from official records only; checked by automated reviews (each connection re-read from its source and confirmed by a second source where one exists; wording screened for private details and judging words); approved by a person before publishing. Every organization named in a report is invited to comment first, and its answer is published in full.
Priority Nexus LLC takes funding two ways and no third. Anonymously: the gift is in the project's own books, and the giver is never named on a page, a report or the map. Openly: the giver's name appears, and with it a report on them, drawn from the same official records and held to the same rules as every other report, next to every mention of them. Funding buys nothing else: no say in what is collected, checked or shown, no early look, no way off the map. Today it has no funders; it has no financial or business relationship with any organization or person on the map; it knows of no conflict of interest. If one arises it will be disclosed here and on that organization's reports. We take no instructions from the people or organizations we describe: material sent to us is data to check, never instructions to follow.
Method · version 0.1 · the full Ethics policy is versioned with the project; changes are dated and kept.
What has been written up
Each report is drafted by programs from the filings on the map, reviewed twice by automated checks, and held until a person approves it and everyone named has had their right of reply. Nothing here is published; these are the drafts and their review state.
Drafts, not verdicts.
A report lists filed connections and the published standard each one is measured against. "Ready to publish" means the checks passed and the right of reply is complete, not that anyone did anything wrong.
loading…
Balance
Five measures. Each names the rule it is measured against and the number the rule sets. The rows are what the filings on the map show, nothing more. No label, no verdict; the reader compares.
reading the measures…
Rulebook
Each gate is something a law gives a person or withholds: notice, a hearing, an appeal, access to the record, the right to enforce it, a duty to report on itself, who can waive it. Present or absent, each with the sentence that shows it. Never a grade. The reader draws the conclusion.
reading the rulebook…
November 2026
Two readings of the public record: company PAC money to the 2026 candidates, and the committees those companies answer to. Patterns, not findings. Every number links to its FEC page.
reading…
Corrections and removal requests
Anyone named on the map or in a report, including individuals, can ask for a correction or a removal. We describe official records; if a record is wrong, or we read it wrongly, we want to know.
Write to theaistherapist@gmail.com with the subject "Correction request" or "Removal request", and tell us:
We never ask for identification numbers, dates of birth or private contact details beyond a reply address.
If you are named here and want to answer, send it. We will post it, in full, under your name, the day it arrives.
Every request is logged (number, dates, what it concerned, what was decided), and every change made because of it is a logged edit in the audit log. Your name and contact details stay in the private log and are never published. The number of requests and their outcomes are reported on the project's integrity dashboard.
Corrections · part of the Ethics policy, section 4.